Bonus of nearly £1million for RBS boss ‘reflects recovery progress’

Board ‘recognises difficulties’ around pay for banks chief Hester
Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester is to receive a £963,000 bonus for last year, the bank’s board confirmed today.

The annual performance payment will be awarded in shares, on top of Hester’s £1.2 million salary for 2011.

The bank – which is 83 per cent owned by the taxpayer – said that the incentive payout reflected “substantial progress in making RBS safer, rebuilding performance in many businesses and improving customer service and support.”

The board said it had allocated Hester 60 per cent – equivalent to 3.6 million shares – of the share award set aside for him in 2011. The shares are deferred and cannot be cashed in until 2014.

It added that Hester’s salary and related benefits remained unchanged from those put in place when he joined RBS in 2008. Last year, Hester’s bonus was calculated to be worth more than £2 million.

“The board is aware of the difficulties in trying to reconcile the competing objectives of all our stakeholders,” said RBS Group chairman, Philip Hampton.

“This is especially true on the issue of pay. Stephen Hester’s pay award reflects progress in the categories agreed with our shareholders as set out in the remuneration report. His pay is strongly geared to the recovery of RBS, which he was recruited to turn around, having played no part in its collapse.”

However, news of Hester’s bonus has been met with criticism from some quarters, particularly as the government remains the largest shareholder in RBS.

The TUC described his annual performance award as “utterly unacceptable” while Liberal Democrat minister Jeremy Browne said Hester was “a public servant” and should turn down the payment.

Shadow financial secretary, Chris Leslie, said: “Anyone who thinks it’s acceptable to award a bonus of almost £1 million on top of a basic salary of £1.2 million in these tough times is desperately out of touch with millions of people who are struggling to make ends meet.”

Following a speech on “socially responsible capitalism” last week, Prime Minister David Cameron responded to rumours about a possible £1.5 million bonus for Hester, saying: “If there’s a bonus, it will be a lot less than it was last year.”

For the past two years, part-nationalised RBS and Lloyds Banking Group have paid no cash bonuses of more than £2,000 to staff.

RBS – which has made thousands of job cuts over the last three years – reported a £2 billion profit for its most recent trading period, compared with a £1.6 billion loss for the same period in 2010.

Comments

Comments in chronological order (6 comments)
Julia 27 January 2012 13:45
 

As an HR Director working for a charity employing extremely dedicated healthcare professionals - many paid below £20,000 and trying to determine whether we can afford a pay increase for them, I am astonished that the banking industry still thinks these lottery level bonuses are acceptable. Excuses will refer to competition and paying for talent...but have they tried going to market? There are thousands of talented job seekers out there who would do the job for less than 1/10th and probably deliver more return on investment. Frustrated just doesn't come into it. Our staff give children the best quality of life they can expect on a daily basis. Banking and political leaders are responsible for the economic crises that has put this country in a position where poorly paid workers are losing the race against inflation. Surely it is time this situation was addressed more robustly.

Report this post

 
Neil Hughes 27 January 2012 13:51
 

Ok Everyone, it sounds like a lot of money.. ..vulgar, and outside our experience. But, this guy is turning around a business we own, and it represents a HUGE investment for us.... ....Would we trust someone doing it for say, £150k?? I think not.

Report this post

 
neil Hughes 27 January 2012 13:53
 

Anyway, it's Alex Salmond's problem - he's the one who needs to take over the bailout if he wants Scotland to be independent.

Report this post

 
Ken Jenkins 27 January 2012 14:34
 

Lets be serious and remove the emotion.
1. labour agreed his salary package when THEY appointed him. Now they say his salry (negotiated lower) is unacceptable. HYPOCRACY at the highest
2. Each 10p in share price = c£20bn to me & you when the shares are sold back by OUR Government. He joined RBS at 9p they are now 27p. £1m bonues for £36bn return looks good to me.
3. The bonus is in shares due in 3 years. So if the business doesn't contnue to grow, then he loses his bonus as we do our investment.

Logic not emotion says that he is not being paid enough. Stop m iixng messages to create emotional responses.

Final comment - If the HRD from the charity who made the earlier commenst could find anyone to do his job for £120k per year (1 tenth), managing over 100,000 staff and a Government hounded business with such emotional commentary then I suggest he is in the wrong job because I couldn't and wouldn't do it for his net £½m salary pa.

Report this post

 
Sarah Cave 30 January 2012 10:50
 

Ken, well said on all points, particularly about the removal of emotion from the equation. It is disgraceful that this story has been reported so widely in the press as if Hester was about to be slipped £1 million in well used fivers, rather than via a share allocation. Shares or share options are well established and appropriate ways of motivating the recipient to improve share price performance. Very recently, the government was propounding the view that more companies should give their employees shares or an equivalent direct stakeholding in the business they work in in order to encourage high performance, as per the John Lewis partnership model. THis weekend sufficient moral and emotional blackmail has been exerted to ensure that Stephen Hester 'turns down' his share award. Further evidence, if any more were needed, that most government ministers have about as much commercial acumen as the average three year old.

Report this post

 
Caroline De Silva 02 February 2012 09:02
 

No let us keep the emotion in it. Ordinary people who I meet who are facing redundancy as a result of the financial tsunami caused by Bankers need to take responsibility. As HR professionals we are expected to behave within a certain code if we sexually or racially harass staff or comitt gross misconduct and still expect to remain in our jobs and receive huge bonuses despite our misconduct would not be tolerated. So when the Government made up of a millionaire cabinet says we are all in it together - that includes the Bankers.

Report this post

 
Post a comment
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you sign in, you will not have to enter your details each time you comment.
All fields are required to make a comment*




Comment

 
These forms are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Any comment posted on the People Management website may be used in the Online Comment section of the People Management magazine. By commenting you are providing permission for us to use the text of your comment and username in this way.

Related articles

 

Share & discuss

[6] Comments
 

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.

Apprenticeships that work

New guidance to help you in developing high-quality apprenticeships

Read the new CIPD guide

HRD Conference 2012

Add value to your business with practical L&D solutions from HRD

25-26 April. Find out more
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.

It’s untenable to have a normal retirement age in public-sector schemes that is significantly different from the state retirement age

Brian Bailey, Director of pensions, West Midlands Pension Fund and member of High Pay Commission