Comment Comment
Comment on the blogs Log in here Become a member Register now
 
Iain Mackinnon

Iain Mackinnon

18 Jul 2008 | 14:05

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.

The cry that there should be more women on the boards of public bodies is not a new one, but the announcement of a target – reported in the People Management news pages – is new. The government-backed Women’s National Commission wants to ensure that by 2011 women make up at least 40 per cent of the membership of public boards. If that sounds rather modest to you, as it does to me, given that women are half the population, the Commission notes that the percentage currently stands at 34 per cent.

Before I rushed into the bloggers’ trap of instant pontification repented at leisure, I checked what the percentage is for the public board which I chair – the board of Ealing, Hammersmith and West London College. We have 19 board places (including staff, students and the principal) and nine of them are held by women (47 per cent) rising to 10 when our new principal joins us: 53 per cent. I think we can claim a tick for that one.

Minorities? Seven out of 19 – though one is our departing interim principal, and 37 per cent in no way reflects the diversity of our students body, which must be at least 90 per cent non-white.

Disability? Hmm: nought out of 19, so far as I know. Let’s move on, shall we?

I’ve pondered these issues for some time, and wonder whether it’s the model of public boards we use in Britain which is wrong. People still use the shorthand “the great and the good” (though mostly now for national bodies, not local ones) and many boards still rely on the time-honoured assumption that suitably worthy people will make themselves available on a wholly voluntary basis. Others pay, with sums varying from a very modest daily allowance to the sort of fee which a private company would pay its non-executives. It’s a muddle.

Why, for example, does a board member of a university get nothing, but a board member of an NHS Trust get £6,000 a year? Where’s the logic in that?

And, back to what the Women’s National Commission is worried about, I wonder if reliance on volunteers narrows the pool of potential board members in ways which are no longer acceptable? It’s a complex business, and I doubt if there’s a simple correlation either way, but I’d like to see the question considered more. It may help to unlock more progress.

NEED HELP? Contact the website support team
 

About the specialists

Iain Mackinnon

Iain Mackinnon

Managing director of the Mackinnon Partnership and a public policy consultant specialising in the people side of economic development,...

John Philpott

John Philpott

Chief economist at the CIPD and visiting professor of economics at the University of Hertfordshire. He has been an adviser to numerous...

Lou Burrows

Lou Burrows

Global head of people at innovation company ?What If! Since joining in 2006 Lou has revolutionised the company's approach to recruitment,...

Peter Honey

Peter Honey

Founder of Peter Honey Publications Ltd. He created the Honey & Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire and has worked as a management...

Peter Reid

Peter Reid

European Employee Relations Consultant who has monitored employment developments in Brussels for almost 20 years. Peter also advises...

Want to be a CIPD member?

Get instant access to CIPD's fantastic member benefits

Join the CIPD today (Opens in a new window)

HRM in an economic downturn

A new section of the CIPD website with useful resources

View pages (Opens in a new window)
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.