Comment Comment
Comment on the blogs Log in here Become a member Register now
 
Steve Crabb

Steve Crabb

27 Mar 2009 | 15:03

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.


Why DO organisations set up systems that allow customers to contact them with questions and complaints and then leave them unanswered and unacknowledged? It so obviously alienates the very people you’d think the organisations would rather not alienate – their customers. I find the whole business quite baffling.

Is it a question of resourcing? Do these organisations set off with the very best of intentions, only to fall victim to their own success in building systems that tempt unmanageable numbers of customers to call in? Are there sheds full of overwhelmed customer services operatives, wiping their brows at this very moment in horror at the mounting stack of unopened pleas for information? Or are the management of these firms the dupes of slacker employees who laugh in the face of the firm’s mission and values and delete heartfelt customer communications for fun? It must be one of these because the other possibility I’ve come up with – that the businesses concerned don’t care enough about their customers to bother to treat them with basic civility – is unthinkable, particularly in the current trading conditions.

I speak from the heart. I’m currently waiting, with increasing hopelessness, to hear back from the firm that publishes Rough Guides (I queried whether there was quite a serious error in one of their books, on the strength of which I booked a holiday) and Freesat, a satellite TV provider (which has been promising to introduce BBC iPlayer to their service for some time but are vague on the details of when this might happen). Neither acknowledged my emails or indicated what their customer-service standards might be, and since it’s been a month since I contacted them, I’ve pretty much decided they have more important things to do with their time than listen to their customers.

I have actually waited longer than that and still got a response. London Underground managed an impressive two-month delay between my complaint coming in and a response going out, but to give them their due, they did signal their service standards at the outset and they did resolve my complaint fully and to my satisfaction. Unlike the BBC and the Man Ray Trust, an art gallery on the south coast…

Yes, every organisation that’s ever blanked my emails remains seared on my mind. And, Freesat and the BBC aside, because I don’t really have any choice about using their services, I’ve never knowingly given my custom again to any organisation that’s treated me so shabbily. It seems indicative of a general arrogance towards customers that I find unappealing. Of course I could be wrong – maybe tomorrow a whole swath of responses will ping into my inbox. Somehow I doubt it.

If you’ve got any experiences of customer service – good or bad – that you’d like to share, I’d love to hear them.

Comments

1. At 22:03 on 28 Mar 2009, Glyn wrote:

Steve – thanks for raising this subject. Like you I have suffered at the hands of organisational complaints procedures – I am currently locking horns with my ISP and gave up with my father’s bank, where I am the appointed attorney.

I am not sure that I would use the word ‘system’ to describe the arrangements that companies have established to process customer complaints. If we look at the whole issue systemically, the problem stems from the initial failure of the organisation to provide its product or service to the standard that customers reasonably expect. Ideally, the outputs of their systems deliver what you and I want, with minimum variation. It’s not exciting, but the customer gets what they require each and every time. How many times do we have a good experience of a product or service yet, when we go back again, it’s not the same?

I fear that people who work in the complaints departments often have a thankless task. They do not have a clear understanding of the system of work that led to the initial failure of product or service. They do not know what caused the system to fail when we needed it to succeed. Crucially, they do not understand the difference between variation that is built into the system itself and variation that is due to a unique event. This inability leads to wrong ‘corrective’ action being taken.

And yet it is not the employees in the complaints department who I would really want to challenge. Their management are responsible for the systems in which those employees work; the same systems that deliver, or fail to deliver, to the customer. Those managers set up functional silos that can destroy any understanding of the real flow of work, they seek to achieve outputs that are within target or specification rather than engage in continuous improvement, they fail to understand the variability of work when solving problems and they benefit from remuneration systems that support this whole regime.

Where is the source of intrinsic motivation for the employee in the complaints department when faced with these odds?

In February 2008, Linda Holbeche CIPD’s Head of Policy and Research wrote “leaders who can develop flexible structures and roles with line of sight to the customer … create a shared sense of direction in the face of ambiguity”. Until leaders grasp this essential truth and know how to engage in continuous improvement of their systems to achieve excellent service delivery, we will make little progress.

Glyn Lumley
Report this post

2. At 09:54 on 02 Apr 2009, Andy wrote:

Steve;
In my and others’ experience, the contrast between GREAT and POOR service is stark: I phone one number and get straight through to a person VERSUS I go through multiple telephone options none of which are relevant to my problem and then wait for ages listening to ‘musak’ and an apologetic voice telling me my call is important to them but I’m paying the cost of the call; the person spends time genuinely listening to and understanding my problem VERSUS the person is trying to get my call closed within their targeted 2.5 minutes; the person solves my problem in one call VERSUS the person transfers me or asks me to call another number only to go through the same tedious process; the organisation quietly gets on with solving problems and improving their service VERSUS the company displays on billboards nationally that they are 1st for customer service and yet whilst they responded to my email within their standard 2 days they actually took 12 emails from 12 different people and 10 days to give me an answer that made true sense.

That is the contrast, but before we blame the people, remember what W Edwards Deming et al said, “When you put good people into a c**p system, the system always wins” (my words not his!).

Who designed the system? Leaders and managers. Who needs to learn new way of thinking about management and the way work works? Leaders and managers? Who are ideally placed to assist leaders and managers to change thinking? HR. What are HR currently doing? Bleating about not being at the boardroom table and doing the wrong things. I say the latter with some personal humility since prior to seeing the light about Systems Thinking, I was that HR person!

It is time HR woke up to this new opportunity to do the right thing for customers, for the organisation and the employees – many organisations are already doing this but unfortunately not led by HR.

Andy Lippok
A Systems Thinker
Report this post

3. At 10:11 on 02 Apr 2009, Steve Crabb wrote:

Thanks to both of you for your comments. I'm going to blog again on this subject, focussing on the positive next time - how organisations that see customer contact as an opportunity to learn and eliminate problems steal a march on their competitors. Your comments on the upstream product standards and systemic issues have given me loads to think about.
Report this post

 
 

About the editors

Claire Churchard

Claire Churchard

News and features writer on People Management

Claire Warren

Claire Warren

The deputy editor at People Management, looking after the features section

James Brockett

James Brockett

News editor at People Management

Jill Evans

Jill Evans

Legal editor on People Management

Rob MacLachlan

Rob MacLachlan

Editor of People Management

Tim Smedley

Tim Smedley

Features writer on People Management.

Apprenticeships that work

New guidance to help you in developing high-quality apprenticeships

Read the new CIPD guide

HRD Conference 2012

Add value to your business with practical L&D solutions from HRD

25-26 April. Find out more
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.

It’s untenable to have a normal retirement age in public-sector schemes that is significantly different from the state retirement age

Brian Bailey, Director of pensions, West Midlands Pension Fund and member of High Pay Commission