Comment Comment
Comment on the blogs Log in here Become a member Register now
 
Peter Reid

Peter Reid

5 May 2009 | 16:49

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.


Late-night negotiations rarely end in happy outcomes: making compromise after compromise just to reach a deal is often a recipe for disaster.

On 26 April, lengthy talks between European Union member states, the European Parliament and the European Commission (EC) on commission plans to remove the UK's opt-out of the 48-hour working week ended in failure.

Reporters say discussions in Brussels on at the start of the month, led by Czech labour minister Petr Nečas, broke down at 4am, but that did not deter the European Parliament and Council of Ministers negotiators from attempting another all-night session. Both clearly flouted the existing EU working time directive, far less any revised additional restrictions.

There was certainly pressure to get a result. The European Commission had threatened member states with legal action for apparently violating the directive in the way they were treating on-call time. And, of course, no member state wants to be in the Presidency when conciliation negotiations between the European Parliament and Council of Ministers have failed for the first time ever.

Mudslinging after the talks broke down came mainly from the European Parliament. Members voted to end the working time opt-out at the end of last year, and those voting this way included UK labour MEPs, going against their own government and party policy and siding with fellow socialist MEPs. They clearly thought member states would back down in the conciliation process. They believed their own hype. When a commissioner pointed the finger at their intransigence, and a member of the Parliamentiary negotiating team stated: “The socialist-dominated negotiating team refused to accept compromises,” and “The all-or-nothing approach ensured that the result was nothing.” Case closed.

European legislative processes are all about building alliances and getting deals. This failure to reach a deal means far more than the collapse of current working time reforms. Doing something once makes it easier to do it again, which does not bode well for future negotiations. The European Parliament should expect more strong bargaining positions from member states and each state’s self-interest will ensure there is no backing down.

So, what does this all mean for UK HR professionals? Obviously, no change on working time at present, and with the forthcoming European elections and new commission to be appointed, threats by the commission to take legal action against some member states will remain threats and not be acted upon. But employers should expect a revised proposal from the commission late this year dealing solely with the issue of on-call time.

There may be no threat from changes to working time, but what about European Works Councils? Member states have slipped through changes that are crude and ill-thought-out. The insanity continues.

Comments

1. At 09:21 on 06 May 2009, Mark Walsh wrote:

Thanks Peter.

Compromise is always a lose-lose, bad strategy and the basis of much EU policy.

Mark

Report this post

 
 

About the specialists

Iain Mackinnon

Iain Mackinnon

Managing director of the Mackinnon Partnership and a public policy consultant specialising in the people side of economic development,...

Ian Buckingham

Ian Buckingham

A specialist in employee engagement. He is the former founding MD of Interbrand Inside and the founder of the Bring Yourself 2 Work...

John Philpott

John Philpott

Chief economic adviser at the CIPD and visiting professor of economics at the University of Hertfordshire. He has been an adviser to...

John Taylor

John Taylor

John Taylor is the chief executive of Acas

Lou Burrows

Lou Burrows

Global head of people at innovation company ?What If! Since joining in 2006 Lou has revolutionised the company's approach to recruitment,...

Peter Honey

Peter Honey

Founder of Peter Honey Publications Ltd. He created the Honey & Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire and has worked as a management...

Peter Reid

Peter Reid

European Employee Relations Consultant who has monitored employment developments in Brussels for almost 20 years. Peter also advises...

Richard Goff

Richard Goff

Richard Goff is one of the CIPD's Relationship Managers, concentrating particularly on relationships with HR Leaders and engaging them...

The Apprentice

The Apprentice

Jo Cameron is a former contestant on The Apprentice and founder of training and development company Jo Cameron’s High Performance Academy....

Apprenticeships that work

New guidance to help you in developing high-quality apprenticeships

Read the new CIPD guide

HRD Conference 2012

Add value to your business with practical L&D solutions from HRD

25-26 April. Find out more
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.

It’s untenable to have a normal retirement age in public-sector schemes that is significantly different from the state retirement age

Brian Bailey, Director of pensions, West Midlands Pension Fund and member of High Pay Commission