Comment Comment
Comment on the blogs Log in here Become a member Register now
 
Keith Rodgers

Keith Rodgers

23 Jun 2009 | 17:11

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.


Don’t tell your finance director, but we’ve finally got confirmation of something we’ve all long suspected: almost half of HR managers keep a crafty eye on their CV when they’re deciding which business software or services to buy.

This was one of the findings from a recent survey of 100 UK HR directors and managers, in which 44 per cent of respondents admitted that expanding their personal experience and enhancing their CV were important factors in helping them determine whether or not to invest in HR software or services. The surprise wasn’t so much that these self-serving instincts play a big role in corporate software selection – it was more the fact that so many senior HR professionals had the guts to admit it.

The choices you make about business software and services are bound to have an impact on your career - a very negative impact if you get it hopelessly wrong and end up running some sprawling IT project that never ends, busts the budget and fails to deliver anything remotely resembling tangible value. And there are plenty of people out there who’ll have realised during their software selection process that shoving a major SAP implementation on your CV isn’t exactly going to hurt it. In fact, software and services play such an integral part in modern people management that there are very good reasons why you should boast about what you’ve done on the IT front, assuming you can translate it into some kind of business benefit. The only question is: are you polishing your CV at the expense of the greater corporate interest?

Thankfully, the answer seems to be “no” for the majority of HR professionals. According to the survey, published by Webster Buchanan Research in association with Computers in Personnel, the biggest drivers for investment in software or services are improving quality of service to employees and managers, reducing HR admin costs and cutting IT costs – three factors that were each cited by almost nine out of 10 respondents. In addition, almost eight out of 10 respondents were looking to improve the quality of management information, and almost three-quarters wanted to free HR from its administrative burdens to provide more strategic input to the business.

This all helps explain why technology, such as manager and employee self-service, are grabbing so much attention in both HR and payroll. According to the survey results, 17 per cent of respondents now provide electronic payslips and a further 42 per cent plan to do so within 12 months – so if you’re not doing it yourself, you could soon find yourself in the minority.

Similarly, almost half the respondents planned to give employees access to their pay history online. A raft of other HR self-service initiatives are also in the pipeline, from recruitment to absence management to training.

Even if economic realities slow down the pace of self-service adoption (as they probably will), the findings suggest that the majority of companies now find the business case for HR self-service pretty compelling. And why not? You can cut admin costs by letting employees enter data and carry out routine transactions, and you can typically provide quicker services and better information access to everyone involved in the process. Achieve that kind of business outcome and, who knows, your revamped CV really might help to propel you to a better job.

 
 

About the specialists

Iain Mackinnon

Iain Mackinnon

Managing director of the Mackinnon Partnership and a public policy consultant specialising in the people side of economic development,...

Ian Buckingham

Ian Buckingham

A specialist in employee engagement. He is the former founding MD of Interbrand Inside and the founder of the Bring Yourself 2 Work...

John Philpott

John Philpott

Chief economic adviser at the CIPD and visiting professor of economics at the University of Hertfordshire. He has been an adviser to...

John Taylor

John Taylor

John Taylor is the chief executive of Acas

Lou Burrows

Lou Burrows

Global head of people at innovation company ?What If! Since joining in 2006 Lou has revolutionised the company's approach to recruitment,...

Peter Honey

Peter Honey

Founder of Peter Honey Publications Ltd. He created the Honey & Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire and has worked as a management...

Peter Reid

Peter Reid

European Employee Relations Consultant who has monitored employment developments in Brussels for almost 20 years. Peter also advises...

Richard Goff

Richard Goff

Richard Goff is one of the CIPD's Relationship Managers, concentrating particularly on relationships with HR Leaders and engaging them...

The Apprentice

The Apprentice

Jo Cameron is a former contestant on The Apprentice and founder of training and development company Jo Cameron’s High Performance Academy....

Apprenticeships that work

New guidance to help you in developing high-quality apprenticeships

Read the new CIPD guide

HRD Conference 2012

Add value to your business with practical L&D solutions from HRD

25-26 April. Find out more
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.

It’s untenable to have a normal retirement age in public-sector schemes that is significantly different from the state retirement age

Brian Bailey, Director of pensions, West Midlands Pension Fund and member of High Pay Commission