Comment Comment
Comment on the blogs Log in here Become a member Register now
 
Iain Mackinnon

Iain Mackinnon

18 Aug 2009 | 10:08

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.


Like Peter Honey, we’ve been recruiting. Unlike Peter, I do a good deal of recruiting, so long ago I decided that I should not reject out of hand an applicant who doesn’t know the difference between “licence” and “license”, or who is keen to tell me about their skill in “liaison” with a wide range of people but is less sure about how to spell the word.

As time has gone on I have got bolder about the process, and even offered feedback where it’s not requested. This time around I explained to one candidate for a trainee consultant post, whom we considered carefully but did not invite to interview, that we might have been more inclined to do so had she told us what class of degree she had (a question that surely the most ardent advocate of political correctness would agree is permissible in a consultancy requiring high-level analytical skills). I told her we assume that if no class of degree is stated, someone must have a 2:2, and recommended her to say so if she did actually have a 2:1 or better.

Trying to be helpful to applicants doesn’t always work and carries some risk – many HR colleagues will think me mad – but in this case it did work. The applicant mailed me back with her thanks, and gave me her marks so I could see that she’d just missed a first. She hasn’t got a job with us, but I think I’ve been helpful to her.

Why, then, will so many HR colleagues think I’ve taken a stupid risk? It’s fear, isn’t it? Fear that an annoyed applicant might take them to a tribunal over wrongful selection. I know my employment law so I don’t think I do anything reckless, but I have no patience with back-watching. But I also know that the chances of anyone bothering to challenge little old us are very small indeed, and that spurs me on. And, if I’m really honest, I’m much less bold when I interview for the college that I chair, not just because the personnel team will leap on me, but also because the chances of an aggrieved applicant making a fuss are much higher. The risk is greater and it’s shared, not mine alone.

It’s a pity. More people would benefit if more recruiters felt able to give honest, well intentioned feedback.

Comments

1. At 10:02 on 20 Aug 2009, Dianne wrote:

Hooray at last someone with common sense! As a HR professional specialising in Resourcing and Recruitment I am delighted to read that there is someone else out there who does not hide behind the ‘perceived’ pitfalls of Employment Law and good HR Practice. Telling people the truth in an informative and fair way has never in my experience been the basis for litigation, this is usually down to bad practice, policies and implementation.
Report this post

2. At 12:47 on 20 Aug 2009, Sally Mason wrote:

I heartily agree - as someone who is temporarily on the other side as the interviewee, I am really disappointed with the lack of any or quality feedback on applications or interviews, which I am seeking not to pursue employers but to help me improve my prospects of getting back to work. I will certainly be a lot more helpful to future applicants.
Report this post

 
 

About the specialists

Iain Mackinnon

Iain Mackinnon

Managing director of the Mackinnon Partnership and a public policy consultant specialising in the people side of economic development,...

Ian Buckingham

Ian Buckingham

A specialist in employee engagement. He is the former founding MD of Interbrand Inside and the founder of the Bring Yourself 2 Work...

John Philpott

John Philpott

Chief economic adviser at the CIPD and visiting professor of economics at the University of Hertfordshire. He has been an adviser to...

John Taylor

John Taylor

John Taylor is the chief executive of Acas

Lou Burrows

Lou Burrows

Global head of people at innovation company ?What If! Since joining in 2006 Lou has revolutionised the company's approach to recruitment,...

Peter Honey

Peter Honey

Founder of Peter Honey Publications Ltd. He created the Honey & Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire and has worked as a management...

Peter Reid

Peter Reid

European Employee Relations Consultant who has monitored employment developments in Brussels for almost 20 years. Peter also advises...

Richard Goff

Richard Goff

Richard Goff is one of the CIPD's Relationship Managers, concentrating particularly on relationships with HR Leaders and engaging them...

The Apprentice

The Apprentice

Jo Cameron is a former contestant on The Apprentice and founder of training and development company Jo Cameron’s High Performance Academy....

Apprenticeships that work

New guidance to help you in developing high-quality apprenticeships

Read the new CIPD guide

HRD Conference 2012

Add value to your business with practical L&D solutions from HRD

25-26 April. Find out more
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.

It’s untenable to have a normal retirement age in public-sector schemes that is significantly different from the state retirement age

Brian Bailey, Director of pensions, West Midlands Pension Fund and member of High Pay Commission