Comment Comment
Comment on the blogs Log in here Become a member Register now
 
Ian Buckingham

Ian Buckingham

14 Dec 2009 | 10:08

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.


I’m fascinated by what has become the widespread abuse of the term “performance culture”. For me this phrase has become inextricably linked with the drive for delivering shareholder value in quarterly increments and the “up or out” mentality that has spilled over from investment banking.

But where does this leave the zealots now that a number of the investment banking supertankers have holed themselves on the reefs of greed, selfishness, arrogance and some fairly suspect practice? Surely it’s time for a fundamental rethink.

I would go so far as to suggest that the culture problem is a widespread issue every bit as serious as the accusations of systemic racism levelled at the police force back in the 1990s. Arguably, this crisis will have even more far-reaching consequences.

The time has come for comprehensive internal reviews followed by an energetic repositioning of the vision, mission and values and associated people processes within many of our leading brand names. This should be the first step towards a reframing of the definition of performance.

This is a complex issue, but consider for a second the long-established theory that an individual is at their most effective within a role some 2.5 years into the job. Or reflect on the equally established best practice that leaders should spend most of their first 100 days listening and gathering information. Contrast this with the notion of “hitting the ground running” and the obsession with quarterly shareholder reporting and year-on-year incremental targeting regardless of conditions. Mixed messages?

It seems a little old fashioned in these high-octane times but there’s sound logic underpinning leadership best practices that call for considered, well-paced decision-making based upon an understanding that the decision-makers will still be around when the impact of their choices come to fruition.

Bankers, for example, used to be remunerated on the basis of loyalty bonuses and benefits packages at preferential rates. Not so long ago, any posting on a CV revealing tenure in a role of under three years was viewed with suspicion. Lift the drains on the recent recruitment drive among the retail banking sector and you will be greeted by whole teams made up of job-hopping former investment bankers.

Don’t get me wrong. I very much believe in the notion of a culture of performance. That’s why we’re all in business after all. I simply don’t believe in the notion of winning at all costs.

Comments

1. At 08:56 on 17 Dec 2009, Andy wrote:

Great points Ian, but I keep coming back to the question Deming posed all those years ago - by what method? He and many others also discovered the great counter intuitive truth that when you look at the performance of an organisation, 95% is due to the system (the way the work is designed) and less than 5% is due to the individual employee. So what does this tell us about where we should be focussing our efforts to improve performance? Certianly not on the areas covered by HR, i.e. the people. Start getting profound knowledge about, go look at how the work works. Then work with the people who do the work to understand and change and improve and perform!

Andy Lippok
A systems thinker
Report this post

 
 

About the specialists

Iain Mackinnon

Iain Mackinnon

Managing director of the Mackinnon Partnership and a public policy consultant specialising in the people side of economic development,...

Ian Buckingham

Ian Buckingham

A specialist in employee engagement. He is the former founding MD of Interbrand Inside and the founder of the Bring Yourself 2 Work...

John Philpott

John Philpott

Chief economic adviser at the CIPD and visiting professor of economics at the University of Hertfordshire. He has been an adviser to...

John Taylor

John Taylor

John Taylor is the chief executive of Acas

Lou Burrows

Lou Burrows

Global head of people at innovation company ?What If! Since joining in 2006 Lou has revolutionised the company's approach to recruitment,...

Peter Honey

Peter Honey

Founder of Peter Honey Publications Ltd. He created the Honey & Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire and has worked as a management...

Peter Reid

Peter Reid

European Employee Relations Consultant who has monitored employment developments in Brussels for almost 20 years. Peter also advises...

Richard Goff

Richard Goff

Richard Goff is one of the CIPD's Relationship Managers, concentrating particularly on relationships with HR Leaders and engaging them...

The Apprentice

The Apprentice

Jo Cameron is a former contestant on The Apprentice and founder of training and development company Jo Cameron’s High Performance Academy....

Apprenticeships that work

New guidance to help you in developing high-quality apprenticeships

Read the new CIPD guide

HRD Conference 2012

Add value to your business with practical L&D solutions from HRD

25-26 April. Find out more
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.

It’s untenable to have a normal retirement age in public-sector schemes that is significantly different from the state retirement age

Brian Bailey, Director of pensions, West Midlands Pension Fund and member of High Pay Commission