Comment Comment
Comment on the blogs Log in here Become a member Register now
 
Rob MacLachlan

Rob MacLachlan

11 Mar 2010 | 10:05

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.


Lucy Adams, the BBC's director of people, sparked protests when she was quoted recently in PM saying that one of her greatest strengths was "not being an HR person". Several readers jumped to her defence in our Letters column in the current issue (11 March) - and fuel is added to the fire when, in Linda Holbeche's article on HR leadership, former Asda people director David Smith is quoted saying that the mark of a good HR leader is "to be as un-HR-like as possible".

Now I suspect that Lucy Adams and David Smith would wish to point out that their comments need to be taken in context, and that they're not denigrating the profession. Yet most of us have heard others saying similar unguarded things at one time or another. Why is it that anyone in an HR leadership position feels the need to distance themselves from the profession?

What Adams, Smith and others are really trying to emphasise is that they're focused on the business rather than the function; strategic and flexible in their thinking rather than procedural and rules-based; financially numerate and focused on results. It's unfortunate but true that many colleagues in other business roles regard these as "un-HR-like" qualities.

But that situation is changing fast. Almost every issue of PM touches on another way in which vigorous HR professionals are helping to drive sustainable business performance. The best already operate at the front edge of strategic thinking and innovation in their organisations, and they couldn't operate effectively if they didn't speak the language of the business. This is a step change in role being well articulated by the CIPD in its new professional standards - known as the HR profession map - and in the Next Generation HR research project.

It so happens that in our next issue (25 March), we'll look in-depth at the working relationships between three HR directors and their chief executives - at Mouchel, McDonald's and Guardian Media Group. These HR leaders are just as business-focused as Lucy Adams or David Smith. But the emphasis is not on what they left outside the boardroom. It's at least as much on the people skills they brought into it. There's plenty to be proud of in the HR profession.

Comments

1. At 12:04 on 24 Mar 2010, Claire Louise Goulding Mew wrote:

I have been in HR now for 20 plus years and went into the profession because I saw its potential and thought that it could be done better. For a long time I felt that the CIPD wasn't keeping up and was almost an irrelevance. I wanted to register my delight at how our professional body has risen to the challenge recently. The HR professional map really sets the standards for the future. Well done!
Report this post

 
 

About the editors

Claire Churchard

Claire Churchard

News and features writer on People Management

Claire Warren

Claire Warren

The deputy editor at People Management, looking after the features section

James Brockett

James Brockett

News editor at People Management

Jill Evans

Jill Evans

Legal editor on People Management

Rob MacLachlan

Rob MacLachlan

Editor of People Management

Tim Smedley

Tim Smedley

Features writer on People Management.

Apprenticeships that work

New guidance to help you in developing high-quality apprenticeships

Read the new CIPD guide

HRD Conference 2012

Add value to your business with practical L&D solutions from HRD

25-26 April. Find out more
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.

Language does not simply reflect what is going on in organisational life: it also influences what people think and what they do

Linda Holbeche, director of the Holbeche Partnership and visiting professor of HRM/OD at Cass Business School