Comment Comment
Comment on the blogs Log in here Become a member Register now
 
Peter Honey

Peter Honey

16 Mar 2010 | 09:05

(Maximum of 120 characters)
Articles more than one month old can be viewed only by CIPD members or PM Subscribers.

I have written before about people claiming to have learnt lessons only for similar mistakes to occur again, and again - and again. Now we have an independent review into the tragic case of a family where, despite contact from 100 care professionals of 28 agencies, a father was free to rape his daughters over a 35-year period. The author of the review, Professor Pat Cantrill, notes that the authorities pledge to learn from their mistakes every time a horrific case of child abuse leads to a serious review. “But”, she says, “we never seem to learn from them.”

I can think of a number of reasons why it is far from straightforward to actually learn from these reports. One reason is undoubtedly that the reports are often published as executive summaries. Inevitably, this must mean that lots of potentially valuable details are missing. I also suspect that summarised recommendations lose their bite and become bland – perhaps sufficiently bland to be easily dismissed: “We knew that before, tell us something new.” I have observed a similar reaction to case studies (and, after all, that’s essentially what a report is) where people distance themselves from the events described because they can’t imagine they would ever have got into such a pickle. A case study, ie, a description of something that happened to someone else, isn’t real.

Even when reports are published in full, there are still some major hazards to overcome if lessons are to be learnt. For example, there are usually far too many recommendations - inviting “recommendation fatigue”. Three absolutely critical “must do” recommendations would suffice. And, regardless of the number of recommendations, the reports need to be worked at, not just read. They need to be trawled through, again and again by different people, with different perspectives, to extract relevant lessons; then the lessons have to be adapted and customised to suit local circumstances; then they have to be sold to whoever needs to implement them; then the resultant actions will need to be monitored to ensure they actually happen and to measure their impact. Lots of “thens”. All this is damned-hard, daunting work that is unlikely to be tackled with the seriousness it deserves – especially if you are convinced that the events described could never happen to you.

Learning lessons from other people’s mishaps seems an obvious and straightforward thing to do, but it clearly isn’t as easy as it seems. Learning from your own mistakes is difficult enough. Learning from other people’s mistakes (second-hand learning), when you haven’t experienced the pain first-hand and have little real incentive to do the work involved, is much tougher; so tough, that it doesn’t happen often.

Comments

1. At 15:05 on 16 Mar 2010, Glyn wrote:

Whilst it seems to me that some of Peter's theories may have a degree of merit, I fear that he repeats one of the greatest mistakes that can be made. These mistakes are rarely about "other people's mishaps". To look for an individual to blame is the wrong place to go; we must learn to seek out the systemic causes (that complex interaction that includes environment (including leadership style), methods of working, and people). Whilst we continue to point the finger of blame, there is no hope.
Report this post

2. At 14:00 on 17 Mar 2010, Andy wrote:

Glyn, I agree that Peter's suggestions do have some merit ,were it not for the fact that these would be undertaken within the same command and control, hierarchical, behaviourist, blame the people organisational and managerial paradigm. It won't make any difference. The fact that all these approaches have been done before should tell people that something fundamentally is wrong with the current system. All that happens is leaders and organisations doing the same things and expecting different results - it's plain stupid thinking! Nothing will change until leaders everywhere in this collosal system altyer their thinking. From what I've observed over the years, I despair of that ever happening - and I'm usually an optimist!
Andy
Report this post

3. At 15:14 on 17 Mar 2010, Eagle-Eye Terry wrote:

I don't think that's what Peter was saying at all, Glyn. He's not blaming any individual as I read it. He's saying that where people make mistakes, and reports are written about them, the learning tends to fizzle out by the end of the process into a report no-one reads. But people do make mistakes, and then other people then can learn from them, you at least admit that surely?! If you looked at the financial crisis of the last few years and didn't look for culprits, you'd never learn anything about how it started and therefore wouldn't be able to prevent it happening again! What's the alternative? Saying 'well it just happened, let's move on and not dwell on it, lest someone get their feelings hurt by us saying they did wrong?'

Terry
Report this post

4. At 11:36 on 18 Mar 2010, Dane wrote:

Reading the comments here I can understand the argument. However, its not ok to blame the system. if someone has made critical errors in judgement or not been able to communicate that there is a major problem in the case something is wrong and they should be accountability along the way. As professional employees we should look at how things work and if it does not work fix it by every means possible.

Yes its takes excellent communication between all departments and not just reliance that the system will work. Clearly it does not work as only high profile cases make the headlines.
Report this post

5. At 17:01 on 19 Mar 2010, Andy wrote:

Of course people make mistakes, but I know from both personal experience and those of colleagues who work in this regime, the system is to blame. We have good people working in a c**p system. Go take a look at the system the social workers have to work in. Of course there will be people who are not up to it and yet despite sacking more and more people each time something goes wrong, we still have children dying every year! Nothing has been and will ever be learned until the regime, the advisers and the government learn to think differently.
May I recommend you read and watch some of the items on the systems thinking review website - here's the link. Listen to what John Seddon and his folks have learned over the past 20 years of what's wrong and a better way of working:
http://www.thesystemsthinkingreview.co.uk/index.php?pg=4&cat=1&title=Current+News
Watch the video first to get an overarching view of what John has discovered, and then see whether Glyn and I are correct in our view.
Andy
Report this post

 
 

About the specialists

Iain Mackinnon

Iain Mackinnon

Managing director of the Mackinnon Partnership and a public policy consultant specialising in the people side of economic development,...

Ian Buckingham

Ian Buckingham

A specialist in employee engagement. He is the former founding MD of Interbrand Inside and the founder of the Bring Yourself 2 Work...

John Philpott

John Philpott

Chief economic adviser at the CIPD and visiting professor of economics at the University of Hertfordshire. He has been an adviser to...

John Taylor

John Taylor

John Taylor is the chief executive of Acas

Lou Burrows

Lou Burrows

Global head of people at innovation company ?What If! Since joining in 2006 Lou has revolutionised the company's approach to recruitment,...

Peter Honey

Peter Honey

Founder of Peter Honey Publications Ltd. He created the Honey & Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire and has worked as a management...

Peter Reid

Peter Reid

European Employee Relations Consultant who has monitored employment developments in Brussels for almost 20 years. Peter also advises...

Richard Goff

Richard Goff

Richard Goff is one of the CIPD's Relationship Managers, concentrating particularly on relationships with HR Leaders and engaging them...

The Apprentice

The Apprentice

Jo Cameron is a former contestant on The Apprentice and founder of training and development company Jo Cameron’s High Performance Academy....

Apprenticeships that work

New guidance to help you in developing high-quality apprenticeships

Read the new CIPD guide

HRD Conference 2012

Add value to your business with practical L&D solutions from HRD

25-26 April. Find out more
Links open in new window
 
People Management neither recommends, nor is responsible for, the content of external sites listed here.
Your link here: contact the PM sales team.

It’s untenable to have a normal retirement age in public-sector schemes that is significantly different from the state retirement age

Brian Bailey, Director of pensions, West Midlands Pension Fund and member of High Pay Commission