Legal

The legal implications for workplace safety now restrictions have lifted

20 Jul 2021 By Gregor Woods

Gregor Woods explores whether employers can scrap Covid infection mitigations now almost all rules have eased

The Covid-19 pandemic has been extraordinarily challenging for employers. Trying to deliver services while keeping staff and customers safe during workforce absence through sickness and isolation has been extremely testing. 

Many have invested large sums of money transforming their workplace, improving ventilation, and supporting homeworking where possible. Policies to increase social distancing and improve hand hygiene have become the norm. 

To assist employers after the lifting of the first lockdown in 2020, the government produced a series of industry-specific notes offering “guidance on how to work safely (and) practical considerations of how this can be applied in the workplace”. 

Those notes sat with other more general government guidance and alongside laws prohibiting or mandating certain steps, such as restrictions on gatherings and the wearing of face coverings in shops. Many, including the police on occasion, confused guidance and law. 

Since 19 July, the government has lifted almost all legal restrictions and it is likely that these guidance notes have also been withdrawn, with an emphasis placed firmly on the judgement of the individual citizen. 

How, then, should employers respond? Is it safe to abandon all infection mitigations introduced previously? 

The answer to that is almost certainly no, at least not yet.

Employers should remember that their responsibility for health and safety is the same as it always was. They are under a legal duty to take reasonable care for the health and safety of their employees and those affected by their operations, including visitors to their premises. 

What that means in practice will vary depending upon the nature of the work undertaken, the working environment and the characteristics of the workforce – but in all cases, the same standard of care is required from the reasonable employer. 

What are the characteristics of the reasonable employer? 

The law says that such an employer keeps abreast of relevant advice and considers a range of factors when deciding what steps are required, including: the likelihood of the risk materialising; the gravity of the harm; the practicality of the steps to reduce the risk; and the characteristics of the workforce. 

This process – the process of a risk assessment – lies at the heart of modern health and safety law and is a critical obligation placed on all employers. It is not a static, once-and-for-all assessment, but requires review as and when circumstances change. 

When reviewing their Covid-19 risk assessment from 19 July, employers will be faced with a varied workforce. Some will have been fully vaccinated – thus having a large but not complete level of protection. Others will be partially vaccinated or not vaccinated at all. In addition, there will be individuals who, by reason of their health, age or ethnic background may be at greater risk from infection. 

The Delta variant is currently accelerating levels of infection, although with modest but increasing levels of hospitalisation. Best estimates currently are that 10-20 per cent of those who contract coronavirus will go on to develop long Covid. A proportion of those may experience debilitating symptoms lasting a considerable time. We know that basic health precautions such as regular handwashing, social distancing and good ventilation greatly assist. 

It is against this background that the employer must assess the risk and impact of infection and what reasonably practicable steps it can take, or continue taking, to mitigate the risk. Immediately abandoning simple, low-cost steps introduced to make the premises Covid secure, because government guidance no longer mandates them, might well be considered inconsistent with the employer’s duty of care. 

As the vaccination programme continues, requirements may change, but employers would be well-advised not to view the lifting of restrictions as meaning a free-for-all when it comes to health and safety in the workplace. 

Gregor Woods is a defendant personal injury partner with CMS

Director of People at PR Week Top 100 communications agency

Director of People at PR Week Top 100 communications agency

Westminster, London

£70,000 - £80,000, depending on experience

PLMR

Human Resources Co-Ordinator

Human Resources Co-Ordinator

Ascot, Berkshire

Up to £28,000

Coworth Park - Dorchester Collection

Head of People Operations

Head of People Operations

Home-based, London or Leeds

Up to £53,376 per annum (Band C) plus benefits

Quakers

View More Jobs

Explore related articles